Aotw.

The article we read today wasn't so bad. I'm not.sure the article's name because it had no obvious title. The article was on animal testing. The writer of the article(Glen Gordan) is on the side that animal testing is bad. I am not convinced what side I would be on. But don't get me wrong I love animals. I have a pet of my own and when it comes down to it I would want her to be affected with chemicals that are for me and others. But I'm not against animal testing either.

If zombies invaded the earth and you had a zombie dog and someone thought they found a cure for the epidemic wouldnt you be fine with you dog getting a shot in the butt? Also what if we found thought we found the cure to cancer. Would you be fine with testing the cure on an animal with cancer? I know for sure I would. And if the dog dies well than your saving it from its misery. There are many ways animal testing could be could for the human race.

This article make a really good point on how animal testing is bad. Glen Gordan write in one section how there are many alternatives. Like: Corrositex. It is artificial skin. So when your testing an animal to see there skin reactions on a new medicine you could use Corrositex instead.